Mechanization of Pruning, Flower/Fruit Thinning, and Harvesting in 2D Peach Orchards

Ignasi Iglesias

Mechanization of Pruning, Flower/Fruit Thinning, and Harvesting in 2D Peach Orchards

In most fruit crops, labor represents the main production cost, ranging from 45% to 75% for stone fruits such as peaches and cherries, respectively

Figure 1 shows the cost breakdown for a mid-season peach variety in the Ebro Valley. It can be observed that harvesting, thinning, and pruning are the most significant cost components.

The increase in labor costs over the past decade has nearly doubled compared to the price received by producers. Moreover, labor availability and skill levels are steadily decreasing (Minas et al., 2023; Iglesias et al., 2023). In this scenario, there is no alternative but to use labor more efficiently, simplify tasks, and substitute part of these with machines for operations like flower and fruit thinning, pruning, and harvesting. The following sections present various aspects related to pruning, thinning, and harvesting in peaches.

PRUNING

Pruning is a fundamental cultivation practice in both stone and pome fruit crops. In Spain’s main fruit-producing areas, pruning has been mechanized for decades, even in traditional volume-based tree shapes like the Spanish vase. Green pruning during the first two to three years is particularly important for shaping the tree. In flat canopy systems and intensive orchards, mechanized pruning is common due to its advantages. Pruning is one of the most important annual operations in fruit trees. It helps control the canopy volume per tree, improve light distribution to both vegetative and fruiting organs, enhance fruit quality, manage crop load, and optimize floral induction for the following year. Various physiological aspects of the peach tree and types of pruning have been described in detail by Iglesias et al. (2023). Two main types of pruning can be performed:

Dormant Pruning (Winter Pruning)

This is the most common for all types of orchards and is typically assisted by electric or pneumatic shears, sometimes with individual or collective platforms to reach the tops of trees in non-walkable orchards (Photos 1 and 2). Figure 2 shows the fruit-bearing organs and pruning types used to maintain growth near the main branches. Dormant pruning can be mechanized with disc pruners when the goal is to reduce canopy volume, though doing so in dormancy may stimulate tree vigor.

Figure 2. Development and training of mixed shoots during the second and third years, indicating whether to retain or prune (left) (Iglesias et al., 2023). Successive dormant prunings in flat systems to keep growth near the main branches (right) (Brunner, 1990).

1
2

Photos 1 & 2. Two options for pneumatic-assisted winter pruning. Vase-shaped on the left, flat triple-axis on the right.

Green or Summer Pruning

Also called pre-pruning, this is done at various times during the growing season to improve light distribution within the canopy, enhance carbohydrate allocation to fruit and vegetative organs, and better control tree vigor (Corelli-Grapadelli & Marini, 2008; Neri & Massetani, 2011; Anthony & Minas, 2021). It is particularly important with vigorous rootstocks and early or mid-season varieties. During the training phase, this pruning helps select structural branches and is essential. In mature trees, one manual pass to remove suckers is crucial for improving light penetration, vigor control, yield, and fruit color.
3
4

Photos 3 & 4. Two options for mechanized green pruning in 2D orchards: topping in two adjacent rows (left) and V-shaped window in a vase form using the new Jumar model.

In mature axial systems (single, double, or triple axis), green pruning is usually mechanized and done before or after harvest, depending on harvest timing (Photos 3 & 4). In some varieties and regions, two passes are done as shown in Figure 3. With low to medium vigor rootstocks, typically only one green pruning pass is performed after harvest. Another option is pre-winter green pruning, done before leaf fall, typically in September. This is usually manual in vase shapes and mechanical with cutter bars in flat forms. In both cases, it enhances light exposure to fruiting wood (mixed shoots, bouquet spurs) for the following season and improves floral bud quality. In flat forms, it also defines final canopy volume and reduces winter pruning time by ~30%. This can be done in one or two rows, combining lateral cuts and topping depending on the machine. Three types of machines are used:

  • Rotary or helical blades (faster),
  • Reciprocating blades (cleaner cuts on tender shoots, slower),
  • Toothed discs (used post-harvest or for thick branches and vase training).
 

Some pruners combine lateral reciprocating blades and topping discs.

Figure 3. Options for summer or green pruning in peach depending on harvest timing.

 

Green pruning limits canopy expansion between rows and in height, improves light penetration, and controls tree vigor. Cutting the distal ends of mixed shoots (Photo 5) promotes new mixed shoot development near the base, which will bear the next year’s crop (Photo 6). As a pre-pruning, this simplifies winter pruning by allowing easy selection of new fruiting shoots (Photo 6).

Cutting near the axis (~5 cm long) with a flat cut encourages new mixed shoot development.

Photos 5 & 6. Detail of green mechanical pruning (yellow) done late May with reciprocating blade (photo taken in July, left). Result of green pruning (blue) and after winter pruning (yellow), photo from late February.

Green pruning significantly reduces branch vigor (Photos 6–8), compacts the canopy, and enhances light penetration in 2D systems, also enabling machine access. Later, one or two mixed shoots are selected during winter pruning (Photo 6).
Photos 7 & 8. Effect of green pruning in late June with reciprocating blades on early variety ‘Boreal’ (left). Green pruning in late variety ‘Lucius’ on July 8, with follow-up photo on March 25.

Thinning

Flower and/or fruit thinning represents a significant cost for early and mid-season varieties with medium to high flower density (Figure 1). In 2D orchards, several well-known tools are used in southern Europe, including Darwin® (Fruit-Tec, Germany), Fuet® (Fruiture Advisors, Spain), and Florix® (Rinieri, Italy). Their effectiveness depends on canopy architecture and phenological stage (Photo 9). Ideal shoots are moderately vigorous, semi-upright, not flexible, vertical, or pendulous. Poor thinning can result from over- or under-thinning. Optimal timing depends on variety and flower attachment. Thinning is best done when the first flowers open rather than at full bloom to avoid damaging fruit and because the flowers detach more easily, requiring fewer revolutions. Rollers such as Ericius® (Valtrons, Spain) and Eclairvale® (La Canne Vale, France) are also used in vase systems (Photo 10). These are less efficient in flat forms but can be used with sequential flower thinning passes. Both systems can also thin small fruits (walnut-size or smaller) after rod modification. Studies show mechanical flower thinning can reduce manual thinning costs by over 50% and improve fruit size and quality (Vitone, 2010; Iglesias & Echeverria, 2021). Flower thinning is essential in medium- to high-blooming varieties, especially early-harvest ones. For mechanical thinning in flat forms using the Darwin, typical tractor speeds are 3–4 km/h and rotor speeds 280–300 rpm. These must be adjusted per variety and flowering stage (from early bloom to 80% open flowers). With these settings, 40–60% of flowers are removed, leaving 3–4 times more than needed, e.g., 12 flowers for 3–4 final fruits. Final fruit thinning (mid-April to mid-May) is done manually. Typically, only 10–12% of flowers are needed for optimal yield, except for low-flowering varieties like ‘Big Top®’. For a walkable vase with 2,200 flowers/tree, about 250–300 fruits/tree remain (185 g/fruit) after thinning, giving 46–55 t/ha for mid-season high-bloom varieties.

Figure 4. Annual cost (€/ha) for different flower and fruit thinning methods in peach for vase (3D) and central leader (2D). From left to right: 1. Manual fruit thinning, 2. Manual flower + manual fruit thinning, 3. Mechanical flower + manual fruit thinning, 4. Mechanical flower with Ericius + manual fruit thinning, 5. Mechanical flower with Darwin + manual fruit thinning.

Photos 9 & 10. Mechanical flower thinning in peach using Ericius in vase and Darwin in central leader systems.

Harvesting

Harvesting is the highest production cost in peach (Figure 1). Since the vase is the main training system in Spain, mechanization has been limited. In non-walkable orchards, when access with small sled ladders is not possible (Photo 11), mechanization is limited to individual platforms like Plameca®, used for pruning, thinning, or harvesting upper canopy areas. In 2D orchards with flatter canopies and better access, harvesting efficiency improves significantly—either from the ground (Photo 12) or with platforms. These orchards may be fully walkable or semi-walkable, the latter using sled ladders for upper areas. In taller orchards, self-propelled conveyor platforms offer higher productivity (over 200 kg/h), except in early varieties. A third option is simpler platforms used only for upper canopy harvests, as in apples.

Photos 11 & 12. Vase harvesting with GF-677 rootstock using sled ladders for upper canopy (left). Fully walkable harvesting in central leader system with Rootpac-20 rootstock (right).

Conclusions

Mechanizing operations like flower thinning and pruning, combined with flat forms and intensive orchards, can reduce these costs by up to 30%, while also advancing production schedules and improving fruit quality—benefits that justify higher planting costs. Additionally, assisted or fully walkable harvesting systems can cut labor costs by improving efficiency. In this context, vigor-controlling rootstocks like the Rootpac series represent a major step toward more efficient and sustainable peach orchards.

Share news

Don't miss any story

Receive our weekly summary with the latest news, articles and resources.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Olint Magazine

Visit our online catalog of published Olint Magazines and access all its content digitally for free.

The SES is a label that identifies Agromillora's value proposition based on super-intensive cultivation.